ELEMENTS OF INTERMEDIATE ANALYSIS IN LITERATURE LESSONS AT COLLEGES OF ART AND AESTHETIC PROFILE
Abstract
The article reflects the results of the study of intermediality as the basis for the effective study of literature, which is advisable to introduce during classes in arts and aesthetics colleges. The author determines the content and meaning of the concept of «intermediality»; defines the peculiarities of teaching literature in high schools of art and aesthetic profile according to the cognitive features of students; substantiates the need to introduce intermediality in academic institutions of art and aesthetic profile, because the most significant means of formation of creative personality of students are different types of art, which predetermines the need to use the interaction of arts in the educational process; Specificity of introducing intermediality as the basis for the effective study of literature, because literature from this point of view is a universal form of art that combines signs of other arts, namely: expressiveness of music, plasticity of sculpture, visuality of painting; varieties of interrelations between literature and other types of arts are investigated; samples of intermediality in literature, samples of student intermedia created in literature classes are given; prospects of using intermediality as the basis for effective literature study in colleges of art and aesthetic profile are determined.
References
Bovsunivs`ka T. V. Kognity`vna zhanrologiya ta poety`ka. Ky`yiv: Ky`yivs`ky`j nacional`ny`j universy`tet imeni T. Shevchenka, 2010. 180 s.
Generalyuk L. S. Vzayemodiya literatury` i my`stecztva nacherk teoriyi slovesno-vizual`ny`x interakcij. Studia Methodologica : Ternopil` : TNPU, 2009. Vy`p. 29. S. 81-88.
Y`l`y`n Y`. P. Postmoderny`zm: ot y`stokov do koncza stolety`ya: эvolyucy`ya nauchnogo my`fa. Moskva : Y`ntrada, 1998. 258 s.
Kly`menko Zh. V. Lekciya 19. Vy`vchennya svitovogo py`s`menstva kriz` pry`zmu ukrayins`koyi kul`tury`. Vsesvitnya literatura v shkolax Ukrayiny`. 2014. # 7-8. S. 36-38.
Kostyuk O. M. Doslidny`cz`ky`j komponent intermedial`ny`x elekty`vny`x kursiv dlya studentiv-filologiv (na pry`kladi dy`scy`pliny` «Literatura i teatr»). My`stecz`ka osvita: zmist, texnologiyi, menedzhment : zb. nauk. pr. Ky`yiv : Vy`d-vo TOV «TONAR», 2018. Vy`p. 13. S. 232-241.
Kostyuk O.M. Doslidny`cz`ky`j komponent kul`turologichnoyi prakty`ky` studentiv-filologiv na kafedri literatury`. My`stecz`ka osvita: zmist, texnologiyi, menedzhment: zb. nauk. pr. Ky`yiv : Vy`d-vo TOV «TONAR», 2017. Vy`p. 12. S. 263-275.
Lupak N. M. Intermedial`ni texnologiyi v sy`stemi my`stecz`koyi osvity` yak pedagogichna innovaciya. Pedagogichni nauky`. Vy`p. LXXXIV T. 2. Xerson, 2018. s. 127-132
Naly`vajko D. S. Vzayemozv'yazky` i vzayemodiyi literatury` j inshy`x my`stecztv v aspekti komparaty`visty`ky`. Literaturny`j dy`skurs: genezy`s, recepciya, interpretaciya (literaturoznavchy`j, kul`turologichny`j i metody`chny`j aspekty`): zb. materialiv mizhnar. konf. / za red. Yu. I. Kovbasenka. Ky`yiv : UAVZL, 2003. S. 3–25.
Popova O. V. Intermedial`ni studiyi u suchasnomu literaturoznavstvi. Problemy` semanty`ky` slova, rechennya ta tekstu. S. 163–167
Prosalova V. A. Intermedial`ni aspekty` novitn`oyi ukrayins`koyi literatury`. Donecz`k: DonNU, 2014. 154 s.
Revenchuk V. V. Vzayemodiya rizny`x vy`div my`stecztv yak chy`nny`k rozvy`tku muzy`chnogo my`slennya uchniv. Psy`xologo-pedagogichni nauky`. 2015. # 2. S. 65-67.
Savchuk G. O. «Intermedial`nist`» yak kategoriya literaturoznavstva j mediologiyi. Literaturoznavchi doslidzhennya: teorety`chni ta pry`kladni aspekty`. 2019. Vy`p. 81. S. 15-18 [Elektronny`j resurs]. URL: https://periodicals.karazin.ua/philology/article/view/14082
Cy`xovs`ka E. D. Teorety`chni dy`lemy` ponyattya intermedial`nosti. Slovo i chas. 2014. # 11. S. 49-59.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.